Rodney Huddleston, Geoffrey K. Pullum and Brett Reynolds, A Student's Introduction to English Grammar, 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2022). This page lists the errors we know about, in the book and in the answer guide.
Cambridge made two rounds of corrections, one in mid‑2022 and one in February 2023. Corrections go into the master files, so they reach the e‑book immediately and print copies at the next reprinting. We sent a third set on 1 April 2024 and were told on 16 April that it wouldn't be implemented; Cambridge corrects a book only until it is two years old, a position the publisher confirmed again in February 2025. So everything in the first two sections below is uncorrected in every printing, and will stay that way unless there's a third edition. The last section records what was fixed, for readers holding a first printing.
Printings vary, and this list is assembled from correspondence rather than from a collation of copies. If something below is already right in your copy, it has been fixed. New reports are very welcome: write to Brett Reynolds (brettrey@gmail.com) and Geoffrey Pullum (pullum@gmail.com).
These ten went to Cambridge on 1 April 2024 and were declined.
| Page | Correction |
|---|---|
| 36 | §2.14, the five types of non-finite clause: bare infinitival (lest you be in danger) ⇒ bare infinitival (let you be in danger). A lest clause isn't bare infinitival. |
| 39 | Exercise 3: delete item viii, Having an Etsy shop makes me feel like that again., and renumber the last two. |
| 41 | Exercise 8 iii: For me, it's my top choice. ⇒ For me, it's my first choice. The exercise asks for AdjPs, and top is a noun, not an adjective. |
| 110 | Exercise 15 vii: He used to be in the army, an Airborne Ranger. ⇒ He used to be in much better shape. |
| 124 | Just before [26]: “In [26] we show the definite NPs in brackets” ⇒ “In [26] we show two definite NPs in brackets”. The pronoun you in [26ii] is a definite NP too, and isn't bracketed. |
| 133 | [45ib]: Is this bag [yours]? ⇒ I've got my bag but not [yours]. |
| 165 | [20]: glad it was over occurs twice. Change the first occurrence to sad that it did. |
| 185 | Second bullet in the list of three reasons: kept secret till later ⇒ love you like crazy. The original doesn't illustrate a preposition with an adjective complement. |
| 194 | Last paragraph of “Object and Predicative Complement”: “as in [28ii]” ⇒ “as in the first example in [28ii]”. |
| 338 | Exercise 3 ii: You can stay at our cabin, but [make sure you bring plenty of warm clothes]. ⇒ You can stay at our cabin, but let us [get back to you on dates]. |
These were reported after the correction window closed, so they were never sent.
| Page | Correction | Reported by |
|---|---|---|
| 214 | [12] v: They shouted enough to wake the baby. is labelled [AdvP modifier in VP]. It should be [DP modifier in VP]. Enough is a determinative, not an adverb. | Afandi Setiawan, July 2024 |
| 250–251 | P. 250 announces “some very simple cases where the interrogative word is head of the interrogative phrase”, but the whose case on p. 251 is Whose bike is this?, where whose is determiner within whose bike, not head. A consistent example would be Whose is this? | Luo Yanyang, February 2026 |
| 322 | The final list item on example [14xi] points the reader to §5.4.1 (PP Complements in Nominals). It should point to §5.4.3 (Indirect Complements). | Johanna Hoogendoorn, February 2025 |
Reported by Ivan Panchenko in March 2025.
| Page | Correction |
|---|---|
| iv | “K. author” ⇒ “K., author” |
| 25 | “object but” ⇒ “object, but” |
| 38 | “are have numbers” ⇒ “have numbers” |
| 98 | “clauses) the indirect” ⇒ “clauses), the indirect” |
| 121 | “about it.)” ⇒ “about it).” |
| 127 | “but the corresponding noun” shouldn't be italicized |
| 154 | “Strawberry Creme pudding mix”: probably Cream |
| 179 | “of a type of known” ⇒ “of a type known” |
| 217 | “answers covers” ⇒ “answers cover” |
| 239 | “Homo Sapiens” ⇒ “Homo sapiens” |
| 282 | “in Chapter 7.)” ⇒ “in Chapter 7).” |
| 291 | “relative, because, because” ⇒ “relative, because” |
| 316 | “(see Chapter 8)” ⇒ “(see Chapter 8))”, to close the preceding parenthesis |
| 325 | “behaviour it's just” ⇒ “behaviour, it's just” |
| 330 | “staff meeting)]” ⇒ “staff meeting])” |
Three further items in that list (sotoo on p. 227, the day[(that) on p. 280, and extraposed subject) is on p. 375) had already been corrected in 2022, which is how we know the copy in question was a first printing. They're in the last section below.
Listed here so the reports aren't lost. These haven't been adjudicated.
Everything in this section was fixed in the master files during 2022 and February 2023. If you have the e‑book, or a printing later than the first, you can ignore it. If you have a first printing (2022), you need it.
| Page | Correction |
|---|---|
| viii | Contents, 12.5: “A Relative Clause that Doesn't Modify a Noun” ⇒ “A Relative Clause that Isn't a Modifier in a Nominal” |
| 3 | Penultimate paragraph ends with a comma; it should be a full stop. |
| 53 | [20], heading of column b: non-modal auxiliary ⇒ lexical verb |
| 63 | “which takes a past participle complement” ⇒ “which takes a past participial complement” |
| 88 | “not ‘sub-part of larger unit’” ⇒ “not merely ‘part of larger unit’” |
| 90 | [5iii]: AdvP adjunct ⇒ PP adjunct |
| 121 | [20iib]: the space in Another three eggs is all we need was underlined; the underlining of Another three eggs and is should be separate. |
| 124 | [26i] and [26ii]: underline the in both cases. |
| 126 | §5.3.2: “Determiner Phrases as Modifiers” ⇒ “DPs as Modifiers” |
| 129 | [38]: four right square brackets were underlined; they shouldn't be. |
| 133 | [44b]: the labels above even read ExtMod:DP and Head:D. Even is an adverb, so they should read ExtMod:AdvP and Head:Adv. |
| 141 | Three lines from the bottom: [55] ⇒ [56] |
| 195 | “can also be expressed, by adverbs like…”: delete the comma. |
| 198 | looking into it: underlining corrected. |
| 200 | “it's a lexical concept” ⇒ “it's a lexical concept” |
| 201 | “idiom is a lexical concept” ⇒ “idiom is a lexical concept” |
| 218 | It was in film rather than in literature that her true talent emerged. ⇒ Often they will, rather than report an error, just assume it's OK. |
| 227 | [15]: “like a complement or an adjunct or a complement?” ⇒ “like an
adjunct or a complement?” [16iv]: to do sotoo ⇒ to do so too |
| 236 | “(You need to tell him), as briefly mentioned in §3.2.3.” ⇒ “(You need to tell him).” |
| 239 | Exercise 9: “Construct an original example sentence with negation of the following constituents.” ⇒ “For each of the following constituents, construct an original example sentence negating that constituent.” |
| 248 | 13[iia]: Who one ⇒ Which one |
| 264 | [5]: complement of noun ⇒ complement in nominal; complement of adjective ⇒ complement in adjp; complement of preposition ⇒ complement in pp |
| 268 | [11], for consistency with p. 264: internal complement of verb ⇒ internal complement in vp; complement of noun ⇒ complement in nominal; complement of adjective ⇒ complement in adjp; complement of preposition ⇒ complement in pp |
| 278 | Last paragraph: “relation to the head noun book” ⇒ “relation to the head noun video” |
| 280 | [6iv]: the day[(that) ⇒ the day [(that) |
| 285 | “can follow Fowler's rule if they want to” ⇒ “can adopt the Fowlers' reform proposal if they want to” |
| 292 | §12.5 heading, as on p. viii. And “a special subtype of integrated relative that doesn't modify a noun at all” ⇒ “…that isn't a modifier in a nominal at all” |
| 294 | Item 7: “open interrogative content clauses” ⇒ “open interrogative main clauses” |
| 313 | First paragraph: “Even a non-finite with secondary tense” ⇒ “Even a non-finite clause with secondary tense” |
| 319 | “see §5.8.2” ⇒ “see §5.8.3” |
| 321 | In [14]: extraposed object ⇒ extraposed non-subject. And in the last two lines: “an extraposed object (see §16.3)” ⇒ “an extraposed internal complement (see §16.3)” |
| 325 | “The first line of the examples in [20] repeats those of [19]” ⇒ “…has similar structure to those of [19]” |
| 363 | [8]: the VP node over was should be V, and Comp:VP should be Comp:Clause. |
| 375 | First paragraph: “extraposed subject) is not a kind of subject” ⇒ “extraposed subject, is not a kind of subject” |
| 379 | In the discussion after [38], signed the bill ⇒ signed it throughout. |
| Page | Correction |
|---|---|
| 12 | The passage illustrating categories now runs on pig and acorns rather than wall and city. In the first printing it discussed wall and city two pages before the sentence This wall protected the city appears. |
| 154 | Item 14 now reads “Underline any NP that could be the antecedent of one in each example. Replace one with an NP based on, but not necessarily identical to, the antecedent.” |
| 178 | Item 17 iii: like her daughter's deleted, giving Faye, wearing a pink polka dot outfit, greets everyone. Items 17 ix and x deleted. |
| 196 | [31]: [400 miles away] ⇒ [[400 miles] away]; [years back] ⇒ [[years] back]; [some time ago] ⇒ [[some time] ago] |
| 273 | Example 7 viii now reads They would carry it only delicately, as if it were a fine piece of furniture. |
| 340 | Example 9 xiv: underlining moved, giving There's no crying in baseball. |
| 358 | Example 9 vi: Africa ⇒ Uganda |
| 394 | Example 15 ix: just ⇒ simply |
For catching these: Ralfs Āboliņš, Peter Evans, Q Higuchi, Johanna Hoogendoorn, Pairoj Kunanupatham, Li Xiang, Luo Yanyang, Ivan Panchenko, Juho Ruohonen, A. Murat Sabuncu, Martin Schäfer, Nathan Schneider, Afandi Setiawan and John Whelan. A book gets better when readers refuse to take it on trust.