Expert Grammaticality Judges as Evaluators, Not Participants: Grammaticality Judgments, Rater Roles, and Research Ethics Review

← Back to publications

A role-classification argument that expert grammaticality judges are participants when studied as people but evaluators when their expertise assesses linguistic materials.

Status: Under review at Canadian Journal of Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique.

The Markdown file is an author-manuscript mirror provided for accessibility, search, and machine readability. Use the linked public record as the canonical citation target unless a later publisher version supersedes it.